A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between potential neighbours in excess of the construction of a wall at a coastal internet site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which has attracted countrywide focus adhering to an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of planning breaches, environmental worries, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Times write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has progressed right into a highly publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design performs at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a business director respectively, search for to create their spouse and children dwelling. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. Based on the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining created by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted under planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally people of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their planning authorization by creating a wall outside of the boundaries of their web site, leading to an encroachment on a Distinctive Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore spots are topic to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, significantly within a delicate coastal natural environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach of their planning authorization, and say the wall, that's partially crafted, is in the correct place. Their lawful workforce has characterised the action as an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The few accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding to be able to protect their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are each really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the website, In keeping with sworn proof referenced during the Irish Moments. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations, a picture which has given that come to be emblematic on the depth with the dispute. These actions were not simply symbolic; they were being intended to Assemble visual evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the h2o throughout severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most striking descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely observed that these types of actions ended up cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area influenced by tidal motion, strengthening Paul Feely and René Collier their argument which the SAC was getting encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately because of the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by worry for environmental safety and adherence to planning law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it's about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their lengthy-standing link to the area and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple just wanting to create a loved ones dwelling in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all operates are actually carried out depending on Qualified information and authorized programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the underlying facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for the predicament a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become additional contentious.
The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier pointed out which the businessman had Beforehand been associated with area advocacy on setting up and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from extremely various Experienced backgrounds can find on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website through the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by means of waist-substantial drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Moments are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting both equally the Actual physical fact from the coastline and also the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions shown dedication; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an excessive technique.
Since the High Court proceedings proceed, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket should figure out whether or not the wall as developed complies with arranging authorization and no matter whether any encroachment into a Exclusive Region of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and planning circumstances. Yet the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Reside along with each other prolonged once the authorized expenditures have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over building will work at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase beyond that address. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the necessity of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. In addition, it underscores how immediately an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental concerns such as environmental safety and property legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a place of pure beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre in the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. No matter whether it is going to eventually be altered, removed, or completed as prepared will rely on the court docket’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will most likely go on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to The most carefully watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.