A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between prospective neighbours more than the construction of the wall at a coastal website inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation that has attracted national interest pursuing an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed loved ones home at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of setting up breaches, environmental worries, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier plus the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has developed right into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building will work at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their family members property. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Ireland’s coastline, exactly where progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of recognized people. According to the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying produced by their possible neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their planning permission by developing a wall further than the boundaries in their web-site, bringing about an encroachment with a Special Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are matter to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have lasting ecological penalties, specially in a sensitive coastal setting including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their planning permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partially designed, is in the right situation. Their legal staff has characterised the motion being an try and delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The couple accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding so as to protect their view, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, where by sights of the sea are both of those very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic initiatives from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-large drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments, an image that has considering that turn out to be emblematic with the intensity with the dispute. These steps weren't merely symbolic; they have been intended to Acquire Visible proof in the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how the two Adult men entered the h2o during significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the positioning became Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions had been cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being lined intimately by the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 became widely searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt construction pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical moment from the legal timeline.
For the Main of the dispute is really a disagreement in excess of boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain which the wall, as manufactured, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of preparing files, maps, and problems hooked up on the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their motion is enthusiastic by worry for environmental security and adherence to preparing law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A personal check out, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got described their prolonged-standing link to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple merely attempting to develop a family members home in accordance Together with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Exclusive Location of Conservation and say that each one functions have already been performed based upon Specialist assistance and accredited ideas. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, like entering the sea through a storm, will not change the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how setting up disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description to get a condition that numerous observers see as Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 increasingly typical. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become far more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier pointed out the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to community advocacy on organizing and environmental issues, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from quite distinct professional backgrounds can find themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning with the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-higher h2o all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods and René Collier waded by waist-high h2o through a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting each the Bodily fact from the coastline as well as symbolic nature with the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions shown dedication; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much method.
As being the High Court proceedings carry on, the end result continues to be uncertain. The courtroom must establish whether the wall as constructed complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. Yet the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who must Reside together with each other extended after the authorized charges are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around building operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation increase over and above that handle. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. It also underscores how rapidly a local disagreement can escalate when basic troubles for example environmental defense and residence legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre with the dispute stands partially created, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized inquiries. Irrespective of whether it will in the end be altered, eliminated, or completed as prepared will depend upon the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probable keep on to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to Among the most closely viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.